printer friendly
back to TOC
 
  Finding Sponsored Funding

  Preparing a Sponsored Proposal

 Setting Up a Sponsored Award

 Managing a Sponsored Award
  Overview
  Budget/Expense Object Codes
  Entering Sponsored Budgets in the General Ledger
  Posting Transactions to Sponsored Accounts
  Monitoring Expenditures
  Account Receivable Management Roles & Responsibilities
  Effort Reporting & Salary Certification
  Cost Transfers
  Re-Budgeting
  Subrecipient Monitoring
  University Policy and Procedures for Financial Reporting
  Inventions & Invention Reporting
  Auditing
  No Cost Extensions: Using the UPAS
  Contacts
 
  Closing Out a Sponsored Award

  Support & Resources at Harvard

  Other Web Links
Post-Audit Information

Regulations

One key factor in the sound financial management of sponsored funds is the post-audit process which assures compliance with pertinent externally imposed regulations on how sponsored money can and should be used. These regulations are found in:

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) 501, 502, 505, and 506

  • Address consistency in allocating costs incurred for the same purpose as well as other information on the CAS requirements for universities.

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-21
    • Establishes university cost principles
    • Defines direct and indirect costs
    • Impacts indirect cost recovery

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-110
    • Addresses administrative requirements
    • Lays out documentation standards

  • Other sponsor terms and conditions regarding expense allowability, allocability, and reasonableness

Need

There is a very high financial and reputational risk whenever Harvard fails to comply with the above regulations. OMB Circular A-133 (Federal Audit Guidelines and Procedures) findings extrapolated across the University would represent a significant amount of disallowed costs. Aside from the financial exposure for the University, there is reputational risk associated with the negative publicity around disallowed costs.

Process in Place

The Office for Sponsored Research performs a risk based approach to conducting post-audit reviews on a monthly basis. The reviews are performed on federal sponsored awards only and focus on high risk expense categories such as consulting fees and costs normally considered indirect costs that are charged to direct costs. The following OMB Circular A-21 criteria are used: OMB Circular A-21:

Questionable transactions are faxed/mailed to the departmental administrator for clarification. OSP will require the department to remove expenses from the federal award if the explanations are not sufficient to meet the above criteria. This risk based approach recognizes that department administrators are responsible for monthly review and reconciliation of sponsored award transactions and monitoring of actual spending to budgets.

 

Finding Sponsored Funding | Preparing Proposal | Setting Up Sponsored Award | Managing a Sponsored Award | Closing Out a Sponsored Award
Support and Resources at Harvard | Other Web Sites

Send your questions or comments about the web site to osr_webmaster@harvard.edu

Site Designed by NetCasters, Inc.