One key factor in the sound financial management of sponsored funds is
the post-audit process which assures compliance with pertinent externally
imposed regulations on how sponsored money can and should be used. These
regulations are found in:
Other sponsor terms and conditions regarding expense allowability,
allocability, and reasonableness
Need
There is a very high financial and reputational risk whenever Harvard
fails to comply with the above regulations. OMB Circular A-133
(Federal Audit Guidelines and Procedures) findings extrapolated across
the University would represent a significant amount of disallowed costs.
Aside from the financial exposure for the University, there is reputational
risk associated with the negative publicity around disallowed costs.
Process in Place
The Office for Sponsored Research performs a risk based approach to conducting post-audit reviews on a monthly basis.
The reviews are performed on federal sponsored awards only and focus on high risk expense categories such as consulting
fees and costs normally considered indirect costs that are charged to direct costs. The following OMB Circular A-21
criteria are used: OMB
Circular A-21:
Questionable transactions are faxed/mailed to the departmental administrator for clarification.
OSP will require the department to remove expenses from the federal award if the explanations are not sufficient to
meet the above criteria. This risk based approach recognizes that department administrators are responsible for monthly
review and reconciliation of sponsored award transactions and monitoring of actual spending to budgets.